Posterior scoliosis correction with thoracoplasty: effect on pulmonary function with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years.

PURPOSE: To perform a study to investigate the influence of posterior scoliosis surgery and thoracoplasty on pulmonary function. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of 37 patients with AIS who underwent posterior instrumented surgical correction with thoracoplasty. There was a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Clinical outcomes were measured using the SRS-22 questionnaires. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using standing posteroanterior and lateral radiographs. All patients had pulmonary function tests to evaluate pulmonary volume and flow (forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)) both before surgery and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: There were three males and 34 females. The mean age of patients was 14.6 years (range 11-21 years). The mean length of follow was 58 months (range 24-124 months). The average main thoracic Cobb angle in the coronal plane was corrected from 50.0° ± 12.4° preoperatively to 16.6° ± 6.3° postoperatively. The average thoracolumbar Cobb angle in the coronal plane was corrected from 28.2° ± 10.6° preoperatively to 10.1° ± 7.2°. The average thoracic kyphosis angle was corrected from 17.4° ± 11.0° preoperatively to 21.8° ± 10.5°. In terms of the Quality of life Outcomes (QoL), there was a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the mean SRS 22 scores from 3.8 preoperatively to 4.3 postoperatively. A statistically significant increase in the absolute forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from pre-operative values with a p value < 0.001 was seen. There was a statistically significant increase in percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second from preoperative values with a p value of 0.008. There was also a statistically significant increase in the absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) from preoperative values with a p value < 0.001. The average percentage predicted forced vital capacity did increase on final follow-up from before surgery, but the increase was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that pulmonary function post-thoracoplasty not only reaches pre-operative levels, but significantly surpasses it with regards to the majority of the pulmonary parameters measured in this study. We also demonstrated satisfactory radiological correction and clinical outcomes.

Systematic Review of School Scoliosis Screening.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the literature on school screening and its reported effectiveness. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no worldwide consensus concerning the mandating of school screening for scoliosis. This remains a controversial issue. METHODS: The following databases were employed: Medline, Premedline, CINAHL, CENTRAL, AMED, Embase, SCOPUS, Ovid nursing, and Web of Science. These data were generated from the Forward Bend Test, the angle of trunk rotation and Moire topography. The first and second authors each independently screened titles and abstracts for potential studies. Fulltext papers of potential studies were also independently read by the first two authors to identify studies to be included based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. A heterogeneity test was performed by testing for the significance of the between-study variance. Publication bias was examined by a funnel plot. RESULTS: We found 20 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of prevalence of scoliosis curves in the population was 1.1% for curves greater than 10°, and 0.2% for curves greater than 20°. The pooled referral rate to radiography during the screening process was 6.6%. The pooled positive predictive values for detecting curves >10° and >20° were 32.3% and 6.5% respectively. Analysis of data demonstrated significant heterogeneity between studies but was not suggestive of the presence of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: We support the implementation of scoliosis screening as a means of detecting curves at an early treatable stage. The current available evidence in the literature for routine scoliosis screening is low to moderate. Challenges exist to the school scoliosis screening including a high referral rate to radiology.